BrianHarer.com
Brian Charles Harer caught the "Boston Wiretap Fever." In 2002, he charged a reporter with hiding his microphone. He lied.
Brian Charles Harer: committed perjury.
MASSACHUSETTS "WIRETAP" FRAME-UPS? WE GOT 'EM! |
New: Authoritative video on Boston and other U.S. frameups |
BrianHarer.comBrian Charles Harer caught the "Boston Wiretap Fever." In 2002, he charged a reporter with hiding his microphone. He lied. |
Brian Charles Harer: committed perjury. |
New Mass. Wiretap Cases
|
National Wiretap Cases
|
Whoa! I discovered that I'm not the only one framed by crooked authorities, Look at this video series I produced for Suffolk University School of Law... (click!) They almost executed Ron Keine to cover up a cop's killing of a man. There's a Boston attorney who won a $100,000,000.000 award against the F.B.I. (more like FIB!) just wait 'til you hear why! And you'll hear from a Boston Criminal Defense Attorney who has his hands full getting innocents out of prison. No potential Juror (this means you) should miss this dose of reality! Am I pissed off at what these turkey are doing to our country? You bet I am! Now you can be too ...See the movie!
|
Manzelli, Pechonis/conte2006, Hyde, Giannone, Lowney, Peyton...
...All prosecuted or threatened under Mass. wiretap law for (allegedly) recording questionable police action. Has a single real wiretapper been prosecuted in the last ten years? Or is 272-99 becoming nothing more than a means to criminilize the right and responsibility of Citizens to watch what our police are doing? Pechonis, Hyde, Giannone, Lowney... do the research. Manzelli was reporting, Big Brother is wiretapping.
Press: The Boston Phoenix Runs a 2-Page Article on MBTA's bizarre prosecution of Reporter Manzelli
Officer
Brian Charles Harer is a Criminal. |
Defense: Officer, this ...was an antiwar protest, correct? ...And you were not ...sympathetic to...their viewpoint, correct? Prosecutor: Objection, Your Honor. The Court: Overruled. Defense: ...you did not agree with their cause, correct? ...Harer: No, Sir. More MBTA "Police" Crime |
|
Freelancer Wiretaps Transit Police?Well, not quite... September 28, 2002 (account of "Freeman Z") He's been watching me record this peace rally on the Common for a radio show, and the microphone's still in my hand. As the rally breaks up, I snap one photo 18 feet away from him. (though they'll Testi-Lie about that in court, painting me as a papparazzo.) He approaches, he looks upset. ...He threatens to sue me. Still, it's a great interview, and that's why I'm here. This is public. I am reporting. What happens belongs on the record. I ask him what law says I need his permission to publish a picture of a public event? He answers "Any Law Book, in Any Law Library" (He goes on with the bizarre behavior.) Then he gets real wiggy about the mic. ...Funny, nobody else did. Thirty minutes later I'm chained to a pole in a sort of bullies' clubhouse in Dorchester, and Brian Harer is posing a series of unlikely and contradictory stories. All of the scenarios end with me hurled into prison for years. The charges he eventually selects are Disorderly Conduct and Wiretapping. Okay, the disorderly must be for getting my tape away from the berserker traincop, or was it throwing my Canon F-1n to the safety of strangers? But Wiretapping? ...(more)
|
Connection: Rodney King Tape When Hyde unsuccessfully appealed his outrageous conviction, (for recording alleged police misconduct on a tape you will now never hear.) a dissenting Commonwealth Judge said this interpretation is wrong because it would incriminate Mr. Holliday, the King Videographer who helped convict the criminals in blue, Koonz and Briscone. The fascist anticonstitutional majority counter-argument: That the Holliday tape required enhancement to be audible. In fact, the King Videographer would be found guilty of violating M.G.L. 272-99 by the element of attempt, therefore the statute criminalizes both citizen and professional surveillance of our Police, in violation of the Commonwealth's own Constitution. |
 |
"I made this photo of MBTA Police Chief O'Laughlin shortly before he granted a short interview explaining his responsibilities at the Bush/Gore debate." Chief O'Laughlin seemed reasonable, though I understand a citizen sued him for "negligent indifference." Since resigning, Chief O'Laughlin has supplied some interesting comments on the MBTA. I understand that A. O'Laughlin's predecessor was Jack O'Donovan, whom I met as a guest at my parent's home in Lincoln. And that B. O'Donovan's ended in resignation or dismissal due to unacceptable conduct regarding racial and/or gender slurs. |
Now, Brian Harer is running from the very laws he's paid to enforce. When Brian Harer threatened to sue the Reporter (literally for reporting) the bully simply walked into an open mic and panicked. Now he's scared that a recording of his misconduct might appear. One might conclude that Prosecution never subpoenaed any alleged recording from Defense for the very same reason the reporter tried to get the tape deck away from the Rogue Cop, because it might indicate Harer is neither fit for his patrol position... nor to train officers in the MBTA's very own Police Academy. Over several decades, the phrase "MBTA Police" (now "Transit Police") has become synonymous with scandal, corruption, bad attitude and ineptitude. Now the Transit Police continue the tradition ...with sharp and venomous new Homeland Security teeth. They've changed their name, ...but not their game. "...Wiretapping?"Harer accuses the Reporter of hiding his hand-held microphone. Harer also said, under oath, it was about "two inches long." ...but It's eight inches long. (oops!) Is it possible that Harer decided to 'relieve' the Reporter of his Constitutional Rights through intimidation and deception? ...And that there's even a recording documenting this? Lying under oath is Perjury, and Perjury is a Felony. So is false arrest and pointlessly interfering with a Reporter's work. |
|
MBTA Police Public Relations Crime Pig !
Well... It looks like yet another MBTA Police fiasco. Let's take a Common-Sense look and see if we can't take a big, big bite outta Right Wing Extremist traincop crime! I'm all fulla fresh, hot Drunkin' Gonuts® coffee, and this hardworking crime pig won't quit 'til justice is served! I can sniff out the scent of a rogue cop every time...and this beady-eyed pug looks mighty suspicious to me. I'll be examining the evidence and together we'll get to the bottom of this! We'll compare the Persecution's claims with the reporter's side of the story, including his evidence not admitted at his trial at the family shaking, heart-breaking of a tax wasting sham called the Boston Municipal Court. I'll apply a little bit of Common-Sense® while Jeff's Friends and Attorneys do their work to clear his good name. |
Video:Car 52, Where Are You?
"If I see (my photo published,) I can sue you..." ...But he'll settle for a felony frameup instead. Our Commonwealth's Constitution warns Officials that they will be held accountable at all times...to the people. So the fact that Reporters are in public, always watching police is no secret. (the wiretap law is based on secrecy, not consent.) However, using intimidation to deny a person's Constitutional Rights is a crime in Massachusetts. And backing that failed attempt up with false and malicious prosecution is also a crime. Harer pretty much admitted to committing intimidation in his affidavit, (though his threats to sue the Reporter and his ad-hoc invention of 'laws' became, in his report, merely polite requests.) Through consistencies in their false testimony, a criminal conspiracy is implied between Harer and Riel. So there's This crime and That crime, yet Prosecuting Attorney ("...If he is a reporter.") Bradley chose to apply his talents toward putting the Reporter in prison. ...for Reporting. |
|
The verb "To testify"From the Latin testis, means literally, to swear upon ones Testicles. But in the courtroom, of course, we substitute a bible. Did Persecuting Attorney Bradley advise Lyin' Brian about this? You took the oarth, and you lied Brian. And now you're going to pay the price. O U C H |
Rogue Trainswine Brian's true potential ?...
Brian Harer: Pretzel Vendor(Satire. Celebrity's head pasted onto model's body.) |
Brian Harer: Combat Gunner(Satire. Celebrity's head pasted onto model's body.) |
brianharer.com is a public information project about Mr. Harer focusing on his public behavior as a sworn officer of the Commonwealth. Brianharer.com is not yet affiliated with the mbta police dept. (now expensively and expansively renamed "Transit Police" Dept.) or with Brian Harer. This website employs satirical humor as a communication device. The facts related are true. Scout's Honor. Since police so often seem incapable of policing themselves, this website offers to help the MBTA Police Department with that important task. |
Harer seized the reporter's photographic equipment, which had nothing to do, even with his fake charges. It took a judge's order to get the equipment back. The Traincops developed a roll of Mr. Manzelli's film, and destroyed a frame. Why? What was on those negatives? Well, sir ...it was puppy dogs playing. |
|
A Little History of Massachusetts Justice System which is Criminal(Judge) Thayer seemed to loathe defense attorney Fred Moore. Thayer frequently denied Moore's motions, lecturing the California-based lawyer on how law was conducted in Massachusetts. On at least two occasions out of court, Thayer burst into tirade. Once he told astonished reporters that "No long-haired anarchist from California can run this court!" According to onlookers who later swore affidavits, Thayer also lectured members of his exclusive clubs, calling Sacco and Vanzetti "Bolsheviki!" and saying he would "get them good and proper". Following the verdict, Boston Globe reporter Frank Sibley, who had covered the trial, wrote a scathing protest to the Massachusetts attorney general condemning Thayer's blatant bias. Then in 1924, after denying all five motions for a new trial, Thayer confronted a Massachusetts lawyer at his alma mater, Dartmouth. “Did you see what I did with those anarchistic bastards the other day?" the judge said. "I guess that will hold them for a while! Let them go to the Supreme Court now and see what they can get out of them!” The outburst remained a secret until 1927 when its release heightened the suspicion that Sacco and Vanzetti had not received a fair trial. (more) |
||
Recording: Vermin Supreme Democratic National Convention, Boston, 2004
Source: Findlaw ...(whether) recording of the phone calls encompassed a violation of the Massachusetts wiretap statute, MGL c. 272, § 99, which as a rule (subject to exceptions and qualifications) denounces secret interceptions.
(recording) devices were...wired into the telephone junction boxes located at the operational centers. Each multichannel apparatus...simultaneously, continuously, and automatically...made recordings of all communications on numerous telephone lines while noting time of day. (more)
